On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:14:32PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 15:09 +1200, David Rowley wrote: > > It shouldn't be a blocker for you, but just so you're aware, there > > was > > a previous proposal for this in [1] and a patch in [2]. I've include > > Jeff here just so he's aware of this. Jeff may wish to state his > > intentions with his own patch. It's been a few years now. > > Great, thank you for working on this! > > I'll start with the reason I set the work down before: it did not work > well with multiple join keys. That might be fine, but I also started > thinking it was specialized enough that I wanted to look into doing it > as an extension using the CustomScan mechanism. > > Do you have any solution to working better with multiple join keys? And > do you have thoughts on whether it would be a good candidate for the > CustomScan extension mechanism, which would make it easier to > experiment with? >
Hi, It seems this has been stalled since jun-2021. I intend mark this as RwF unless someone speaks in the next hour or so. -- Jaime Casanova Director de Servicios Profesionales SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL
