On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 03:14:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: [...] > > Here's what I found, along with some commentary about each one. > > Patch Age in CFs > > Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries 23 > Last substantive discussion 2021-01, currently passing cfbot > > It's well known that I've never liked this patch, so I can't > claim to be unbiased. But what I see here is a lot of focus > on specific test scenarios with little concern for the > possibility that other scenarios will be made worse. > I think we need some new ideas to make progress. > Proposed action: RWF
if we RwF this patch we should add the thread to the TODO entry it refers to > > Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers 18 > Last substantive discussion 2021-07, currently failing cfbot > > This has been worked on fairly recently, but frankly I'm > dubious that we want to integrate a 2PC XM into Postgres. > Proposed action: Reject > Masahiko has marked the patch as RwF already > schema variables, LET command 18 > Last substantive discussion 2021-09, currently passing cfbot > > Seems to be actively worked on, but is it ever going to get > committed? > I had already moved this to Next CF when I read this, but I found this sounds useful > Remove self join on a unique column 16 > Last substantive discussion 2021-07, currently passing cfbot > > I'm not exactly sold that this has a good planning-cost-to- > usefulness ratio. > Proposed action: RWF > It seems there is no proof that this will increase performance in the thread. David you're reviewer on this patch, what your opinion on this is? > Index Skip Scan 16 > Last substantive discussion 2021-05, currently passing cfbot > > Seems possibly useful, but we're not making progress. > Peter G mentioned this would be useful. What we need to advance this one? > standby recovery fails when re-replaying due to missing directory which was > removed in previous replay 13 > Last substantive discussion 2021-09, currently passing cfbot > > This is a bug fix, so we shouldn't drop it. > Moved to Next CF > Remove page-read callback from XLogReaderState 12 > Last substantive discussion 2021-04, currently failing cfbot > > Not sure what to think about this one, but given that it > was pushed and later reverted, I'm suspicious of it. > I guess those are enough for a decision: marked as RwF If this is useful a new patch would be sent. > Incremental Materialized View Maintenance 12 > Last substantive discussion 2021-09, currently passing cfbot > > Seems to be actively worked on. Moved to Next CF > > pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL 12 > Last substantive discussion 2021-03, currently passing cfbot > > This is a bug fix, so we shouldn't drop it. > Moved to Next CF > Fix up partitionwise join on how equi-join conditions between the partition > keys are identified 11 > Last substantive discussion 2021-07, currently passing cfbot > > This is another one where I feel we need new ideas to make > progress. > Proposed action: RWF It seems there has been no activity since last version of the patch so I don't think RwF is correct. What do we need to advance on this one? > > A hook for path-removal decision on add_path 11 > Last substantive discussion 2021-03, currently passing cfbot > > I don't think this is a great idea: a hook there will be > costly, and it's very unclear how multiple extensions could > interact correctly. > Proposed action: Reject > Any other comments on this one? > Implement INSERT SET syntax 11 > Last substantive discussion 2020-03, currently passing cfbot > > This one is clearly stalled. I don't think it's necessarily > a bad idea, but we seem not to be very interested. > Proposed action: Reject for lack of interest > Again, no activity after last patch. > SQL:2011 application time 11 > Last substantive discussion 2021-10, currently failing cfbot > > Actively worked on, and it's a big feature so long gestation > isn't surprising. > Moved to Next CF > WITH SYSTEM VERSIONING Temporal Tables 11 > Last substantive discussion 2021-09, currently failing cfbot > > Actively worked on, and it's a big feature so long gestation > isn't surprising. > Moved to Next CF > psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option 11 > Last substantive discussion 2021-09, currently passing cfbot > > This got committed and reverted once already. I have to be > suspicious of whether this is a good design. > No activity after last patch > Split StdRdOptions into HeapOptions and ToastOptions 10 > Last substantive discussion 2021-06, currently failing cfbot > > I think the author has despaired of anyone else taking an > interest here. Unless somebody intends to take an interest, > we should put this one out of its misery. > Proposed action: Reject for lack of interest > The author of the patch claimed that a rebased version should happen at mid-august but it hasn't happened. RwF seems reasonable to me, done that. -- Jaime Casanova Director de Servicios Profesionales SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL
