Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Incidently the fix looks quite simple. See patch attached.
ISTM this patch effectively proposes to make procedures have their own
namespace yet still live in pg_proc. That is the worst of all possible
worlds IMO. Somewhere early in this patch series, I complained that
procedures should be in a different namespace and therefore not be kept
in pg_proc but in some new catalog. That argument was rejected on the
grounds that SQL requires them to be in the same namespace, which I
wasn't particularly sold on, but that's where we are. If they are in
the same namespace, though, we have to live with the consequences of
that, including ambiguity. Otherwise there will soon be questions
like "well, why can't I create both function foo(int) and procedure
foo(int), seeing that there's no question which of them a particular
statement intends to call?".
regards, tom lane
