Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-03-18 19:30:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is it sane for pg_regress to unset PGDATABASE unconditionally? Not
>> sure, but if we're generally always specifying a value, maybe that's
>> OK.
> I'm not sure either. I wonder whether we should just make ecpg's
> pg_regress invocation do so? That seems to be the way of least
> resistance ;)
Don't think I like ecpg's tests behaving differently in this respect
than the rest of them do; that seems like a recipe for unrecognized
security issues.
If nobody can think of a positive reason for pg_regress not to
unset PGDATABASE unconditionally, let's try that and see how it
goes.
regards, tom lane
