On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:40:18AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2018-03-16 9:34 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp >> That's true, but doesn't the additional rule make it more >> bothersome to maintain the list? > > Hard to say. I have not opinion. But just when I see in this context > variables like listen_address, shared_preload_libraries, then it looks > messy.
Let's be clear. I have listed all the variables in the patch to gather more easily opinions, and because it is easier to review the whole stack this way. I personally think that the only variables where the patch makes sense are: - DateStyle - search_path - plpgsql.extra_errors - plpgsql.extra_warnings - wal_consistency_checking So I would be incline to drop the rest from the patch. If there are authors of popular extensions willing to get this support, let's update the list once they argue about it and only if it makes sense. However, as far as I can see, there are no real candidates. So let's keep the list simple. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature