On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> (2018/03/14 14:54), Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/03/06 21:26, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> if (mtstate->mt_transition_capture != NULL)
>>> {
>>> if (resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc&&
>>> (resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc->trig_insert_before_row ||
>>> resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc->trig_insert_instead_row))
>>> {
>>> /*
>>> * If there are any BEFORE or INSTEAD triggers on the
>>> partition,
>>> * we'll have to be ready to convert their result back to
>>> * tuplestore format.
>>> */
>>> mtstate->mt_transition_capture->tcs_original_insert_tuple =
>>
>> NULL;
>>>
>>> mtstate->mt_transition_capture->tcs_map =
>>> TupConvMapForLeaf(proute, rootRelInfo, leaf_part_index);
>>> }
>>>
>>> Do we need to consider INSTEAD triggers here? The partition is either a
>>> plain table or a foreign table, so I don't think it can have those
>>> triggers. Am I missing something?
>>
>> I think you're right. We don't need to consider INSTEAD OF triggers here
>> if we know we're dealing with a partition which cannot have those.
>>
>> Just to make sure, a word from Thomas would help.
>
> +1
Agreed. INSTEAD OF triggers can only be created on views, and views
can't appear in a partition hierarchy, so the comment is misleading
and the test is redundant. Thanks for picking this up.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
