On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I've started "make check" with parallel_schedule tweaked to contain many > select_parallel runs, and so far I've seen a couple of failures like > this (about 10 failures out of 1500 runs): > > select count(*) from tenk1, tenk2 where tenk1.hundred > 1 and > tenk2.thousand=0; > ! ERROR: lost connection to parallel worker > > I have no idea why the worker fails (no segfaults in dmesg, nothing in > posgres log), or if it's related to the issue discussed here at all.
That sounds like the new defences from 2badb5afb89cd569500ef7c3b23c7a9d11718f2f. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
