On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote: > > I don't see anything in the commit message or linked discussion to > > indicate that any visible behavior change was intended, so I think > > you're right, this is a bug. Will check and push your patch. > > Actually, this patch still wasn't quite right: although it fixed > one aspect of the behavior, it still produced identical results > for typemod NULL and typemod -1, which as the function's comment > explains is not what should happen. I tweaked the logic to look > as much as possible like before, and added a regression test. > Thanks Tom. Regards, Rushabh Lathia www.EnterpriseDB.com
