On 03/02/2018 12:31 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > On March 1, 2018 3:22:44 PM PST, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> >> >> On 03/01/2018 11:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 2018-02-20 22:23:54 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: >>>> So I've decided to revive the old patch, rebase it to current >> master, >>>> and see if we can resolve the issues that killed it in 2016. >>> >>> There seems to be some good discussion in the thread. But the patch >>> arrived just before the last commitfest and certainly isn't a trivial >>> cleanup patch. Therefore I think it should be moved to the next CF? >>> >> >> It isn't a massive invasive patch either, though, so I object to moving >> it to 2018-09 right away. > > Why do we have rules around not submitting large stuff to the last > cf, if we just not follow through? We're neck deep in patches that > are older. And you've already gotten a fair bit of feedback.. >
It was not my intention to break (or even bend) the CF rules, of course. I haven't considered the patch to be "large stuff", while you do. I see Peter Geoghegan agrees with your conclusion on another thread, so go ahead and move it to 2018-09. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
