Hi, On 2018-02-25 21:39:46 +0300, Yura Sokolov wrote: > > If that's the case then does it really make sense to make this change..? > > I don't think it is really necessary to implement generic version > through templated.
Why? > Updated numbers are (same benchmark on same notebook, but with new > master, new ubuntu and later patch version) (average among 6 runs): > > master - 16135tps > with templated qsort - 16199tps > with bucket sort - 16956tps > > Difference is still measurable, but less significant. I don't know why. > > Rebased version of first patch (qsorted tamplate) is in atttach. Hm, that's a bit underwhelming. It's nice to deduplicate, but 16135tps -> 16199tps is barely statistically significant? - Andres
