On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2018-03-01 12:56:35 +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote: > > I've tried to rebase this patch to 10 and, despite minor rebase issues > (oids, bgw_type, changes to specscanner), patch works fine. > > Do we provide backporting for such features? > > Definitely not. With very rare exceptions (OS compatibility and the > like), features aren't backported. > Yeah. And definitely not something that both changes the format of pg_control (by adding new possible values to the checksum field) *and* adds a new WAL record type... -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
