On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:24:37AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > I suspect I'm going to get some grief for this, but I think the time has > come to bite the bullet and support changing databases in the same > process...
I'd like to see that. Last time this has been discussed, and Robert complained to me immediately when I suggested it, is that this is not worth it with the many complications around syscache handling and resource cleanup. It is in the long term more stable to use a model where a parent process handles a set of children and decides to which database each child should spawn, which is what autovacuum does. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature