On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I see several things we could do about this: > > 1. Nothing; just say "sorry, we don't promise that the regression tests > pass with no plan differences on nonstandard configurations". Given that > --disable-float8-byval has hardly any real-world use, there is not a lot > of downside to that.
That would make sense to me. It will also be necessary to formalize what "nonstandard configuration" actually means if we go this way, of course. I believe that this is already true with "dynamic_shared_memory_type == DSM_IMPL_NONE", so that's a second entry for the "nonstandard configuration" list. -- Peter Geoghegan
