Alvaro Hernandez <a...@ongres.com> writes:
> On 17/02/18 11:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
>>> Here is a attempt at extending --scale so that it can be given a size.
>> I do not actually find this to be a good idea. It's going to be
>> platform-dependent, or not very accurate, or both, and thereby
>> contribute to confusion by making results less reproducible.
>>
>> Plus, what do we do if the backend changes table representation in
>> some way that invalidates Kaarel's formula altogether? More confusion
>> would be inevitable.
> Why not then insert a "few" rows, measure size, truncate the table,
> compute the formula and then insert to the desired user requested size?
> (or insert what should be the minimum, scale 1, measure, and extrapolate
> what's missing). It doesn't sound too complicated to me, and targeting a
> size is something that I believe it's quite good for user.
Then you'd *really* have irreproducible results.
regards, tom lane
