Nikolay Shaplov wrote: > В письме от 15 февраля 2018 12:53:27 пользователь Alvaro Herrera написал:
> So I would prefer to keep it untested while we are done with reloptions, and > then test it in a good way, with creating dummy index and so on. I think it > will be needed for more tests and educational purposes... > > But if you will insist on it as a reviewer, I will do as you say. No, I don't, but let's make sure that there really is a test module closer to the end of the patch series. > > Oh, I didn't mean to steer you away from a C enum. I just meant that we > > don't need to define the numerical values ourselves -- it should be fine > > to use whatever the C compiler chooses for each C symbol (enum member > > name). In the code we don't refer to the values by numerical value, > > only by the C symbol. > > Ah that is what you are talking about :-) > > I needed this numbers for debug purposes, nothing more. If it is not good to > keep them, they can be removed now... > (I would prefer to keep them for further debugging, but if it is not right, I > can easily remove them, I do not need them right now) I'd like to give this deeper review to have a better opinion on this. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services