Etsuro Fujita <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: > (2018/02/08 10:40), Robert Haas wrote: >> Uggh, I missed the fact that they were doing that. It's probably >> actually useful test coverage, but it's not surprising that it isn't >> stable.
> That was my purpose, but I agree with the instability. Thanks again, > Robert! According to https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=rhinoceros&dt=2018-02-08%2001%3A45%3A01 there's still an intermittent issue. I ran "make installcheck" in contrib/postgres_fdw in a loop, and got a similar failure on the 47th try --- my result duplicates the second plan change shown by rhinoceros, but not the first one. I speculate that the plan change is a result of autovacuum kicking in partway through the run. regards, tom lane
