On 2/7/18 00:14, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:45:52PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I think what I had meant to write was something like >> >> (t.tgtype & (1 | 66)) >> >> but maybe it's clearer to write it all out as you did. > > If you prefer that, that's fine for me as well. I tend to prefer the > formulation where both expressions are separated to make clearer that > ordering needs to be split for all three characteristics.
Committed with the separate entries. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
