On 2018/02/05 13:20, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> >> Yeah, the patch in its current form is wrong, because it will give wrong >> answers if the operator being used in a SAOP is non-strict. I modified >> the patch to consider operator strictness before doing anything with nulls. > > That's fine, but I am not sure whether this fits constraint > exclusion's charter. Please add this patch to the next commitfest so > that we can have a better opinion.
OK, done. Thanks, Amit
