On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 at 5:14 pm, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote:
> If I am right my recommendation for getting this patch in is to > initially skip the new operators and go back to the version of the patch > which uses @>. We really need an initial patch to get accepted and postpone anything that won't affect the core mechanics of the patch. So yes, I move towards delaying the introduction of @>> to the patch. A new patch will be ready by tomorrow. Besr Regards, Mark Rofail > >
