On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:03 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Attached patch fix_markbufdirty_hash_index_v1.patch fixes the problem >> by calling MarkBufferDirty at the appropriate place in the code. >> However, I noticed that we might end up calling MarkBufferDirty twice >> for metapage in _hash_addovflpage. I think we can easily avoid that >> as is done in patch fix_markbufdirty_hash_index_v1.1.patch. > > IIUC, the v1 patch is fixing a bug, but the v1.1 patch is a minor > optimization. >
Yes. > I'm going to take the easy way out and push v1 to v10 > and master. > Okay. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
