Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Unfortunately, that has the pretty significant downside that a lot of > people who actually want the postgresql-server-jit package will not > realize that they need to install it, which sucks. But I think it > might still be the better way to go. Anyway, it's for individual > packagers to cope with that problem; as far as the patch goes, +1 for > structuring things in a way which gives packagers the option to divide > it up that way.
I don't know about rpm/yum/dnf, but in dpkg/apt one could declare that postgresql-server recommends postgresql-server-jit, which installs the package by default, but can be overridden by config or on the command line. - ilmari -- "The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law "Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with the consequences of." -- Skud's Meta-Law
