On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Hi Peter (and others who mucked around with related code), > > While testing another patch I found that cancelling a parallel query on > master segfaults the leader in an interesting manner: ... > It's clearly not OK to recurse back into the executing query after a > failure, even less so if resources like the underlying DSM segment have > already been freed. > > I suspect this is largely the fault of > > commit 8561e4840c81f7e345be2df170839846814fa004 > Author: Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> > Date: 2018-01-22 08:30:16 -0500 > > Transaction control in PL procedures
Yeah, I think this must be the fault of that commit, and I think your diagnosis is accurate. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
