On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm busy with other things, so no rush.
Got it. There is one question that I should probably get clarity on ahead of the next revision, which is: Should I rip out the code that disallows a "degenerate parallel CREATE INDEX" when parallel_leader_participation=off, or should I instead rip out any code that deals with parallel_leader_participation, and always have the leader participate as a worker? If I did the latter, then leader non-participation would live on as a #define debug option within nbtsort.c. It definitely seems like we'd want to preserve that at a minimum. -- Peter Geoghegan
