Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> FWIW, I think this problem could just as well be addressed with a few
> printing heuristics instead of actually needing an actual list of
> typedefs.
Step right up and implement that, and we'd all be happier. Certainly
the typedefs list is a pain in the rear.
> There'd be one or two edge cases of bad formatting, but the
> end result would be far less painful than what we have today, were
> basically nobody can format their patches without a lot of manual
> cherry-picking or large scale unrelated whitespace changes.
IMO, the big problem here is that people commit large changes without
having pgindent'd them first.
regards, tom lane
