Em ter, 23 de jan de 2018 às 03:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi all, > > While reading the code, I realized that the requesting an autovacuum > work-item could fail in silence if work-item array is full. So the > users cannot realize that work-item is never performed. > AutoVacuumRequestWork() seems to behave so from the initial > implementation but is there any reason of such behavior? It seems to > me that it can be a problem even now that there is only one kind of > work-item. Attached patch for fixing it. > Seems reasonable but maybe you can use the word "worker" instead of "work item" for report message. -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io >> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello >> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
