On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 1/20/18 17:39, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Michael Paquier < > michael.paqu...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> These are both clear bugs, and the docs one should definitely be both > >> applied and backpatched. > >> > >> How much do we care about the error message when it comes to > backpatching? > >> Maybe we should leave that one to 11 only, to avoid breaking that, as > the > >> way it's written it's actually less wrong there. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > Thanks for your input! > > > > Applying the error message portion only on HEAD is a good plan, there is > > no point to make the life of translaters unnecessary painful. > > I would backpatch both. The updated error message is arguably easier to > translate. > Fair enough. And since you do the translation merging at least, I'll go with that. Thus, applied and backpatched to 10. Thanks! -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
