At Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:57:38 +0500, Andrey Borodin <x4...@yandex-team.ru> wrote 
in <62c2b9a0-51bc-40ff-9bca-f203784cb...@yandex-team.ru>
> Hello!
> > 18 янв. 2018 г., в 10:48, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 
> > <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> написал(а):
> > 
> > Gist imposes the ninth strategy to perform index only scan but
> > planner is not considering that
> > ....
> > Please find the attached patch.
> I agree with you that current behavior is a bug and your patch seems correct.
> I'm a bit worried about ninth strategy words: fetch is not necessary now, if 
> opclass lacks compress methods - index only scan is possible. See 
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/d3a4f89d8a3e500bd7c0b7a8a8a5ce1b47859128
>  for details.

It is true. I don't think that fetch for trigm is feasible but it
is workable if created.

> Though there are tests in cube and seg for that, if your patch passes 
> check-world, than this behavior is not affected.

regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center


Reply via email to