On 15 January 2018 at 08:03, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
> Greeting Shubham, all, > > * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Shubham Barai > > <shubhambara...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have attached the rebased version of patch here. > > > > The patch does not apply and there has been no reviews as well. In > > consequence, I am moving it to next CF with "waiting on author" as > > status. Please provide a rebased patch. > > Shubham, would you mind providing an updated patch which applies > cleanly, so we can change this to Needs Review and hopefully get someone > looking at it? Also, it would be good to respond to Alexander's as to > if it would work or not (and perhaps updating the patch accordingly). > Otherwise, I'm afriad this patch may end up just getting bumped to the > next CF or ending up as 'returned with feedback'. Would be great to get > this up to a point where it could be committed. > > > Hi Stephen, The new approach was suggested after completion of GSoC. So, I didn't get enough time to implement this approach. Also, I was constantly updating my patches for gist and gin index based on reviews. Here, I am attaching the rebased version of the patch (which is based on an old approch: acquiring a predicate lock on primary page of a bucket) Kind Regards, Shubham
Predicate-Locking-in-hash-index_v5.patch
Description: Binary data
