On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It's definitely concerning that the submitted patch introduced a new bug, > but we have seldom taken the position that bugs in an initial submission > are sufficient grounds for rejecting the entire concept.
Fair point. I withdraw my categorical -1 vote and replace it with the statement that the patch hasn't been sufficiently-carefully checked by the patch author or other reviewers for bugs to consider committing it -- nor has anyone taken the trouble to list with precision all of the places where the behavior will change. I think the latter is absolutely indispensable, which is why I started to compile such a list in my previous post. The former needs to be done as well, of course. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
