Greetings, * Konstantin Knizhnik (k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru) wrote: > On 04.12.2017 19:44, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: > >> > >>On 30.11.2017 05:16, Michael Paquier wrote: > >>>On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik > >>><k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >>>>Concerning broken partition_join test: it is "expected" failure: my patch > >>>>removes from the plans redundant checks. > >>>>So the only required action is to update expected file with results. > >>>>Attached please find updated patch. > >>>The last patch version has conflicts in regression tests and did not > >>>get any reviews. Please provide a rebased version. I am moving the > >>>patch to next CF with waiting on author as status. Thanks! > >>Rebased patch is attached. > >I don't think this is a rebase on the previously posted patch ... it's > >about 10x as big and appears to be a thorough rewrite of the entire > >optimizer. > > Or, sorry. I really occasionally committed in this branch patch for > aggregate push down. > Correct reabased patch is attached.
This patch applies, builds and passes 'make check-world', with no real review posted of it, so I don't believe it should be 'Waiting on Author' but really in 'Needs Review' status, so I've gone ahead and updated the CF with that status. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
