On 23 December 2017 at 10:56, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:49:34AM +0100, Feike Steenbergen wrote: >> On 21 December 2017 at 14:11, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > You mean a WAL receiver here, not a WAL sender. >> >> Fixed, thanks > > [nit] > /* > - * Only superusers can see details. Other users only get the > pid value > + * Only superusers and members of pg_read_all_stats can see > details. > + * Other users only get the pid value > * to know whether it is a WAL receiver, but no details. > */ > > Incorrect comment format. > [/nit] > > Committers run pgindent on each patch before committing anyway, and what > you are proposing here looks good to me, so I am marking that as ready for > committer. Simon, as the original committer of 25fff407, could you look > at what is proposed here?
Yup, I got this. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
