On 2 October 2017 at 22:21, Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru>
wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Shubham Barai <shubhambara...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, page-level predicate locking should happen only when fast update is
>> off.
>> Actually, I forgot to put conditions in updated patch. Does everything
>> else look ok ?
>>
>
> I think that isolation tests should be improved.  It doesn't seems that
> any posting tree would be generated by the tests that you've provided,
> because all the TIDs could fit the single posting list.  Note, that you can
> get some insight into GIN physical structure using pageinspect contrib.
>
>
I have created new isolation tests. Please have a look at
updated patch.

Regards,
Shubham

Attachment: Predicate-locking-in-gin-index_4.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to