On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:29:09AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:33:24PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> It does make sense, probably, to push 0001-0003 first and see if >> anything turns up from that, then 0004. > > I have not looked at 0001 in details yet, which was going to be my next > step. If you could wait for at least two days that would be nice to give > me some room.
So, looking at 0001 now... Shouldn't there be a DatumGetBool8(), with the existing DatumGetBool() which should depend on the size of bool? I can see that all the catalogs are correctly updated with bool8 in the patch. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
