On 28 December 2017 at 23:59, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On 21 Dec. 2017 22:42, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> >> > wrote: >> >>> The pg_indent on www is outdated, and doesn't understand --version . >> >>> https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/dev/ >> >> > Is there a reason to keep it at all if its obsolete, or should we just >> > delete it? >> >> The only reason I can think of why someone might still want that version >> is if they're doing hacking on a pre-v10 branch and would like to indent >> accordingly. If we have someplace for historical versions, I'd suggest >> moving this tarball to there, and replacing it with a README that says >> "go here for pre-v10 pgindent, or there for modern versions". >> >> >> Add it as a branch in the git repo and backpatch the pgindent README? >> >> Hardly seems worth the hassle. It's not like back patches need tons of >> worry about pgindent etc anyway. >> > > That seems way overkill, yeah. > > We don't have a place for historic versions of this stuff. We have the > archive directory but that's specifically a tarball of the last cvs stuff. > > I think a simple README is the way to go. > > I've cooked together something simple and pushed it. Please review and > suggest changes. > > Perfect. Thanks! -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
