On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:55:19AM +0100, Feike Steenbergen wrote: > On 21 December 2017 at 05:32, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Don't you want to put that in its own <caution> block? That's rather > > important not to miss for administrators. > > I didn't want to add yet another block on that documentation page, > as it already has 2, however it may be good to upgrade the > note to a caution, similar to the prepared transaction caution.
Yes, I agree with this position. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
