On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Michael Paquier >>> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I would just write "To >>>> avoid calling CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS which can happen when releasing a >>>> LWLock" and be done with it. There is no point to list a full function >>>> dependency list, which could change in the future with static routines >>>> of lwlock.c. >> >> Agreed. Updated the comment. > > Robert actually liked adding the complete routine list. Let's see what > Fujii-san thinks at the end, there is still some time until the next > round of minor releases.
What I think is the patch I attached. Thought? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
fix_do_pg_abort_backup_v12_fujii.patch
Description: Binary data
