On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, >
Hi, > Julien Rouhaund, who has proposed a patch for partition-wise ordering > mentioned to me offlist that the comments for PartitionBoundInfoData > do not mention the fact that the datums in datums array are ordered. I > think that's important to mention there. So here's patch to do that. > Thanks for the patch! I agree this should mentioned in the comment. small typo: + * PartitionBoundInfoData structures for two partitioned table with exactly same should be "tables".
