On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > I'm not a fan of having *only* warning in the back-branches. What I > would think we'd do here is correct the back-branch documentation to be > correct, and then add a warning that it changes in v11. > > You didn't suggest an actual change wrt the back-branch warning, but it > seems to me like it'd end up being morally equivilant to "ok, forget > what we just said, what really happens is X, but we fix it in v11."
Yeah, I'm very unclear what, if anything, to do about the back-branch documentation. Suggestions appreciated. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
