On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Unless there is disagreement on the above, it seems we should apply >> Yura's patch (an edited version, perhaps). >> > > IIRC the patches that makes the cleanup scan skip has a problem > pointed by Peter[1], that is that we stash an XID when a btree page is > deleted, which is used to determine when it's finally safe to recycle > the page. Yura's patch doesn't have that problem? > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAH2-Wz%3D1%3Dt5fcGGfarQGcAWBqaCh%2BdLMjpYCYHpEyzK8Qg6OrQ%40mail.gmail.com
The latest patch present on this thread does not apply (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c4a47caef28024ab7528946bed264...@postgrespro.ru). Please send a rebase. For now I am moving the patch to next CF, with "waiting on author". -- Michael
