On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Jeevan Chalke <
jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Antonin Houska <a...@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
>> The following test
>>
>> -- Input relation to aggregate push down hook is not safe to pushdown and
>> thus
>> -- the aggregate cannot be pushed down to foreign server.
>> explain (verbose, costs off)
>> select count(t1.c3) from ft1 t1, ft1 t2 where t1.c1 =
>> postgres_fdw_abs(t1.c2);
>>
>> produces the following plan
>>
>> QUERY PLAN
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> Aggregate
>> Output: count(t1.c3)
>> -> Nested Loop
>> Output: t1.c3
>> -> Foreign Scan on public.ft1 t2
>> Remote SQL: SELECT NULL FROM "S 1"."T 1"
>> -> Materialize
>> Output: t1.c3
>> -> Foreign Scan on public.ft1 t1
>> Output: t1.c3
>> Remote SQL: SELECT c3 FROM "S 1"."T 1" WHERE (("C 1"
>> = public.postgres_fdw_abs(c2)))
>>
>> which is not major problem as such, but gdb shows that the comment
>> "aggregate
>> cannot be pushed" is not correct. In fact, postgresGetForeignUpperPaths()
>> *does* create the upper path.
>>
>> The reason that UPPERREL_GROUP_AGG is eventually not used seems to be that
>> postgresGetForeignJoinPaths() -> add_foreign_grouping_paths() ->
>> estimate_path_cost_size() estimates the join cost in rather generic way.
>> While
>> the remote server can push the join clause down to the inner relation of
>> NL,
>> the postgres_fdw cost computation assumes that the join clause is applied
>> to
>> each pair of output and input tuple.
>>
>> I don't think that the postgres_fdw's estimate can be fixed easily, but
>> if the
>> impact of "shipability" on (not) using the upper relation should be
>> tested, we
>> need a different test.
>>
>
> Oops. My bad.
> Agree with your analysis.
> Will send a patch fixing this testcase.
>
Attached patch to fix the test case. In new test case I am using a JOIN
query where JOIN condition is not safe to push down and hence the JOIN
itself is unsafe. Due to which AggPushDown does not consider that relation.
Also, I have used ft2 in the query which has use_remote_estimate set to
true.
Thanks
>
>
> Thank you Antonin for catching and reporting it.
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Antonin Houska
>> Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
>> Gröhrmühlgasse 26
>> A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
>> Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at
>>
>>
--
Jeevan Chalke
Technical Architect, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
index 1063d92..bce3348 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
@@ -3160,21 +3160,23 @@ drop operator public.<^(int, int);
-- Input relation to aggregate push down hook is not safe to pushdown and thus
-- the aggregate cannot be pushed down to foreign server.
explain (verbose, costs off)
-select count(t1.c3) from ft1 t1, ft1 t2 where t1.c1 = postgres_fdw_abs(t1.c2);
- QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+select count(t1.c3) from ft2 t1 left join ft2 t2 on (t1.c1 = random() * t2.c2);
+ QUERY PLAN
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate
Output: count(t1.c3)
- -> Nested Loop
+ -> Nested Loop Left Join
Output: t1.c3
- -> Foreign Scan on public.ft1 t2
- Remote SQL: SELECT NULL FROM "S 1"."T 1"
+ Join Filter: ((t1.c1)::double precision = (random() * (t2.c2)::double precision))
+ -> Foreign Scan on public.ft2 t1
+ Output: t1.c3, t1.c1
+ Remote SQL: SELECT "C 1", c3 FROM "S 1"."T 1"
-> Materialize
- Output: t1.c3
- -> Foreign Scan on public.ft1 t1
- Output: t1.c3
- Remote SQL: SELECT c3 FROM "S 1"."T 1" WHERE (("C 1" = public.postgres_fdw_abs(c2)))
-(11 rows)
+ Output: t2.c2
+ -> Foreign Scan on public.ft2 t2
+ Output: t2.c2
+ Remote SQL: SELECT c2 FROM "S 1"."T 1"
+(13 rows)
-- Subquery in FROM clause having aggregate
explain (verbose, costs off)
diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql b/contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql
index 0986957..1df1e3a 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/sql/postgres_fdw.sql
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ drop operator public.<^(int, int);
-- Input relation to aggregate push down hook is not safe to pushdown and thus
-- the aggregate cannot be pushed down to foreign server.
explain (verbose, costs off)
-select count(t1.c3) from ft1 t1, ft1 t2 where t1.c1 = postgres_fdw_abs(t1.c2);
+select count(t1.c3) from ft2 t1 left join ft2 t2 on (t1.c1 = random() * t2.c2);
-- Subquery in FROM clause having aggregate
explain (verbose, costs off)
