On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> Do you have test case, which can reproduce the issue you >>> explained above? > >> No. It would require some surgery in standard_planner() to measure the >> memory consumed in the planner context OR build the code with >> SHOW_MEMORY_STATS defined and dump memory context statistics and check >> planner context memory usage. I don't think I can produce a testcase >> quickly right now. But then, I think the problem is quite apparent >> from the code inspection alone, esp. comparing what mark_dummy_rel() >> does with what create_unique_path() is doing. > > Yeah. I think the code in mark_dummy_rel is newer and better-thought-out > than what's in create_unique_path. It probably makes sense to change over.
This has remained unanswered for more than 8 months, so I am marking this patch as returned with feedback. -- Michael
