On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > It seems I wrote an Assert in the code to support hash partitioning that > wasn't based on a valid assumption. I was wrongly assuming that all hash > partitions for a given modulus (largest modulus) must exist at any given > time, but that isn't the case.
Committed 0003 with some adjustments: * Renamed the new test to partition_prune. * Moved the test to what I thought was a better place in the schedule file, and made it consistent between serial_schedule and parallel_schedule. * commutates -> commuted * removed wrong /* empty */ comment * Updated expected output. It surprised me a bit that the tests weren't passing as you had them, but the differences I got - all related to mc3p_default - seemed correct to me -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
