On 2017-11-29 09:41:15 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I'd still like a review of this patch. > > I don't think there's much to review apart from this one issue. > Neither Tom nor I seem to be convinced about: > > +/* not worth providing a workaround */
FWIW, I think that's a perfectly reasonable choice. Adding complications in making static assertions work for random archaic compilers when compiling with c++ just doesn't seem worth more than a few mins of thought. Greetings, Andres Freund