On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > The patch does not apply anymore and needs a rebase. There are also a > bunch of whitespace errors, no documentation in the patch, and it > seems to me that this patch introduces many concepts so it could be > broken down into many individual steps. Finally, I strongly recommend > that you review other's patches. You have two patches, including this > one, registered into this commit fest but your name is showing nowhere > as a reviewer. The patch you are proposing here is large, the usual > recommendation being to review one patch of equal difficulty for each > patch sent to keep the inflow and outflow of patches balanced.
With a high-level look, this patch requires a bit more work.. I am unsure as well if that's a feature which would prove to be useful, but without documentation it is hard to make an opinion of it. I am marking the patch as returned with feedback. -- Michael
