On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed. Attached the updated patch, please review it.
+ /* + * Quick exit if session is not keeping around a non-exclusive backup + * already started. + */ + if (sessionBackupState != SESSION_BACKUP_NON_EXCLUSIVE) + return; I think that it would be more solid to use SESSION_BACKUP_NONE for the comparison, and complete the assertion after the quick exit as follows as this code path should never be taken for an exclusive backup: + Assert(XLogCtl->Insert.nonExclusiveBackups > 0 && + sessionBackupState == SESSION_BACKUP_NON_EXCLUSIVE); And your patch would discard both SESSION_BACKUP_EXCLUSIVE and SESSION_BACKUP_NONE. -- Michael