Noah, * Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 10:36:38AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Our planned migration schedule is as follows: > > > > Nov 6 - > > pgsql-www > > > > Nov 13 - > > pgsql-hackers > > When each list migrated, its mbox archives stopped receiving new messages:
This was actually anticipated, though we had been thinking that the migration would be faster and so it wouldn't end up being such a long time that the mbox's wouldn't get updated. The plan is to replace those mbox's (which are created by mj2 and then rsync'd over currently) with ones generated from the archives database, but that's something which will basically happen to the entire site and all the lists at once. Further, there will actually be some differences between the archive-generated mbox's vs. those that came from mj2; in particular, the 'date' used by mj2 is the 'received' date (from what I can tell) while the 'date' in the archives database is the 'Date:' header from when the message is sent by the user. That said, this will make the mbox's match the actual webpages, which they don't currently because the webpages are built from the archive database while the mbox's are from mj2. In addition, while trying to cross-compare the two, I think I'm seeing some cases where mj2 is just outright dropping messages also (for example, I don't see https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170930224424.ud5ilchmclbl5y5n%40alap3.anarazel.de anywhere in the mj2 mboxes..). I'm chatting w/ Magnus about this now and I'm not sure exactly when we'll end up making the change, but my feeling is that we should either do it now, or on Monday when we migrate the 'user' lists. Doesn't seem to me like we should delay it any longer than that. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
