Tom Lane wrote: > Do we really want the existence of a function foo(int) to mean > that you can't create a SQL procedure named > foo and taking one int argument?
Isn't it pretty much implied by the ALTER | DROP ROUTINE foo(...) commands where foo(...) may be either a procedure or a function? It doesn't look like it could be both. Best regards, -- Daniel Vérité PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org Twitter: @DanielVerite
