On 06/01/07 19:17, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/01/07 18:35, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

Since DDL is infrequent, is that bottleneck an acceptable trade-off?

Define infrequent? I have customers that do it, everyday in prod. They do it willingly and refuse to change that habit.

Even 2 or 3 ALTER TABLE or CREATE INDEX or CREATE TABLE statements per day is a drop in the bucket compared to the number of I/U/D statements, no?

True.

So Alexander Staubo's idea of synchronous DDL replication via 2PC has some merit?

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to