I have been able to run a test like you have in a query (if that's the right
term), and ORDER BY does work. When trying to run via psql, it fails, I
can't see what I'm doing wrong. (windows xp, postgres 8.2.0-1)

ups=# select proc_item_list(1,true);
   proc_item_list
--------------------
 <unnamed portal 3>
(1 row)

ups=# fetch all from "<unnamed portal 3>";
ERROR:  cursor "<unnamed portal 3>" does not exist
ups=#


Michael Fuhr wrote:
> 
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:18:42PM -0700, novnov wrote:
>> It seems that at least in the way I've written the function below, ORDER
>> BY
>> is ignored.
> 
> Works here (see below).  Can you post a complete example that shows
> ORDER BY being ignored?  Do you get different results from the
> cursor than if you execute the same query directly?  What version
> of PostgreSQL are you running?
> 
> 
> CREATE TABLE t_item (
>     item_id      integer PRIMARY KEY,
>     item_name    text NOT NULL,
>     item_org_id  integer NOT NULL,
>     item_active  boolean NOT NULL
> );
> 
> INSERT INTO t_item VALUES (4, 'four', 1, true);
> INSERT INTO t_item VALUES (2, 'two', 1, true);
> INSERT INTO t_item VALUES (1, 'one', 1, true);
> INSERT INTO t_item VALUES (3, 'three', 1, true);
> 
> BEGIN;
> 
> SELECT proc_item_list(1, true);
>    proc_item_list   
> --------------------
>  <unnamed portal 1>
> (1 row)
> 
> FETCH ALL FROM "<unnamed portal 1>";
>  item_id | item_name | item_org_id | item_active 
> ---------+-----------+-------------+-------------
>        1 | one       |           1 | t
>        2 | two       |           1 | t
>        3 | three     |           1 | t
>        4 | four      |           1 | t
> (4 rows)
> 
> COMMIT;
> 
> -- 
> Michael Fuhr
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/function-retuning-refcursor%2C-order-by-ignored--tf3837519.html#a10876641
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to