Cyril VELTER wrote:
>       OK, I've the results of my tests :
> 
>       With the previous code, then message "SOCKERROR" is printed 5 times 
> during the 
> whole process (100 Gb dump import with psql). There one group of three and 
> one 
> group of two, but I don't have timestamps and am not sure if they are 
> printing 
> in the same loop or not. The import is finally successful.

Ok.


>       The second test I have done is to remove FD_ACCEPT I still have the 
> message 
> one times, but it still happen. The import is also sucessfull.

Ok. So FD_ACCEPT is not the fix. Good, I didn't think it would be.


>> I'm also a bit worried about it getting caught in a tight loop if the
>> error codes are wrong, but probably it just goes back into waitfor.. and
>> blocks the second time. Otherwise, you'd see screenfuls of that message.
>>
>> Can you determine if it was hit two times right after each other, or if
>> there was time between them?
> 
>       For the first test I don't known the amount of time between them (I 
> have two 
> groups separeted in the logs with other messages).

Ok. I'm thinking of just sticking a minimal wait in there to protect
against absolute runaway, but that should be enough I think.


>       What do you think ? may be a bug in the windows server installation I 
> have 
> (this machines have not been updated for some times, perhaps I should try to 
> do 
> that and see if the problem is still there. In the long run, I plan to 
> upgrade 
> to windows 2003).

I don't *think* it should be a bug with your version, it doesn't look
like it. but if you're not on the latest service pack, that's certainly
possible. Please update to latest servicepack + updates from Windows
Update / WSUS, and let me know if the problem persists.

Meanwhile, I'll try to cook up a patch.

//Magnus

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to